If the Jets trade down and give up an opportunity to draft one of the consensus three best players in the draft; Q, Bosa or Allen, it better be because they are making a lopsided deal in their favor. Let me be specific, last year we moved up from 6 to 3 for Darnold and traded what ultimately turned out to be 900 more value points than the draft trade value chart dictates. That was a terrific haul for the Colts. 900 VP's is what I would call a lopsided deal with the Colts making a killing, and thats what I expect in return if the Jets are trading away an opportunity to draft one of the consensus three ELITE players in this draft. If they are swapping 3 and 4 with the Raiders and still getting one of the elite players because the Cards took Murray #1, that would be the lone exception for me. I still want something above chart value, like their 2nd RD Pick, but that's only about 100 VP's over chart value, so it's not making a killing but in that case I can live with it because we are still drafting one of the three consensus elites (not counting Murray or Haskins). But if we are taking ourselves OUT of the elite prospects derby, then we better be making a killing or just make the pick and don't trade down.I am reading more and more that the Jets are looking to trade down. Bosa and Allen are not our guys unfortunately.
Unless we get a haul as GJ&H described above we have to take our edge rusher now (BTW - if it's the Giants we trade with I'd also ask for them besides their two first rounders to include their second rounder in exchange for one of our third rounders).
Mac knows how important it is to land that edge rusher this time around, Edge rushers of this quality don't come around in the draft very often and his job is very much on the line this time and he is aware of that as well. I believe they are listening to offers, mostly with a deaf ear, because some team may feel desperate enough to mortgage their future and give us both a kings and queens ransom for that pick and I also believe that it would have to still allow him to fill that position of need, edge rusher, that has haunted the Jets for a long time.
There is only one question that Mac should be asking himself: Which is more correlative to winning and going deep in the playoffs: a very good offensive line or a very good edge rusher? The answer is obviously a good offensive line. We almost never see a final four or top six team which has an average or mediocre offensive line. Often times teams win the Super Bowl without a great edge rusher. The two seasons the Jets came close to going to the Super Bowl under Rex Ryan they did so with a below average quarterback and no premium edge rusher but a great offensive line. I live in the Boston area and despise the Pats but i see what they place the value on: the offensive line. They let Chandler Jones go, they let Jamie Collins go and now Trey Flowers. But they continuously draft OL in the first two rounds or trade second day picks for OL. Just as in baseball good pitching in the playoffs trumps good hitting, so it is in football that a good offensive line neutralizes good pass rushers. Because of that Mac has to trade down even if he does not get a haul (he should not be taken to the cleaners either) and get an edge rusher and some ammunition to move up to get a center and draft another OL such as a road grader guard or a very good developmental tackle prospect. If the Jets trade down 6 to 8 spots most likely Montez Sweat or Brian Burns will be there, both or whom are close to the level or Allen. If they are not just get two OL studs and together with KO let the offensive line and the offense dominate games. Use the rest of the draft to help the defense. Perhaps we will even get some draft capital for next year as well.
Whether Mac is capable of answering the question correctly or executing an appropriate trade down and drafting well is another question i probably don't want to know the answer to.
There is only one question that Mac should be asking himself: Which is more correlative to winning and going deep in the playoffs: a very good offensive line or a very good edge rusher? The answer is obviously a good offensive line. We almost never see a final four or top six team which has an average or mediocre offensive line. Often times teams win the Super Bowl without a great edge rusher. The two seasons the Jets came close to going to the Super Bowl under Rex Ryan they did so with a below average quarterback and no premium edge rusher but a great offensive line. I live in the Boston area and despise the Pats but i see what they place the value on: the offensive line. They let Chandler Jones go, they let Jamie Collins go and now Trey Flowers. But they continuously draft OL in the first two rounds or trade second day picks for OL. Just as in baseball good pitching in the playoffs trumps good hitting, so it is in football that a good offensive line neutralizes good pass rushers. Because of that Mac has to trade down even if he does not get a haul (he should not be taken to the cleaners either) and get an edge rusher and some ammunition to move up to get a center and draft another OL such as a road grader guard or a very good developmental tackle prospect. If the Jets trade down 6 to 8 spots most likely Montez Sweat or Brian Burns will be there, both or whom are close to the level or Allen. If they are not just get two OL studs and together with KO let the offensive line and the offense dominate games. Use the rest of the draft to help the defense. Perhaps we will even get some draft capital for next year as well.
Whether Mac is capable of answering the question correctly or executing an appropriate trade down and drafting well is another question i probably don't want to know the answer to.
There is only one question that Mac should be asking himself: Which is more correlative to winning and going deep in the playoffs: a very good offensive line or a very good edge rusher? The answer is obviously a good offensive line. We almost never see a final four or top six team which has an average or mediocre offensive line. Often times teams win the Super Bowl without a great edge rusher. The two seasons the Jets came close to going to the Super Bowl under Rex Ryan they did so with a below average quarterback and no premium edge rusher but a great offensive line. I live in the Boston area and despise the Pats but i see what they place the value on: the offensive line. They let Chandler Jones go, they let Jamie Collins go and now Trey Flowers. But they continuously draft OL in the first two rounds or trade second day picks for OL. Just as in baseball good pitching in the playoffs trumps good hitting, so it is in football that a good offensive line neutralizes good pass rushers. Because of that Mac has to trade down even if he does not get a haul (he should not be taken to the cleaners either) and get an edge rusher and some ammunition to move up to get a center and draft another OL such as a road grader guard or a very good developmental tackle prospect. If the Jets trade down 6 to 8 spots most likely Montez Sweat or Brian Burns will be there, both or whom are close to the level or Allen. If they are not just get two OL studs and together with KO let the offensive line and the offense dominate games. Use the rest of the draft to help the defense. Perhaps we will even get some draft capital for next year as well.
Whether Mac is capable of answering the question correctly or executing an appropriate trade down and drafting well is another question i probably don't want to know the answer to.
Green Jets & Ham;n175113 said:Kim Jones: "It'll take an enormous offer for Jets to trade #3 pick. They believe they can get a real impact player on defense with that pick."
http://www.nfl.com/videos/up-to-the-...rade-No-3-pick
Let's hope they mean it because I've been saying the same thing. I'm not trading away an opportunity to draft one of the three elite defensive players in this draft unless someone blows me away with a lopsided proposal in our favor.