What galls me the most, is Kraft's "no incontrovertible evidence" statement. This is like when the cops bring in the suspect and she says "you cant prove anything....you got nothing on me...." Guilty.
OK. Let's get something straight here. The wording used in the report is
exactly the wording in the rules that state the requirement for proving the rules have been broken. Not only the Pats, but the general news media, have made a great deal about the wording, something like "more likely than not", or "more probable than not." But that is
exactly the standard described in the rules for proving that the rules were in fact broken. So when the report says Brady more likely than not knew that the ball guys were deflating the balls, that means the report is saying Brady definitely broke the rules. Not that he might have broken the rules, but that he did in fact break the rules. So if Goodell says anything that implies that Brady might not have broken the rules and so applies a lesser punishment, that is a total whitewash. In summary, the report says Brady definitely broke the rules, and the punishment should be commensurate with definitely breaking the rules, not a maybe. The report was intentionally worded the way it was so as to leave no doubt. Period.