This is what the pre-season is for
Not if they've already decided there won't be a competition . . .
This is what the pre-season is for
All fair points, OCCH, but I'm not talking about only 2015, I'm talking about finding a QB who can give you a chance to win championships for the next ten years. The best organizations don't go year to year with their QB's. Its not a case of, okay, this year we'll start Fitzpatrick, next year its Petty, the year after that the kid we draft in RD 1 in 2016 etc. etc.But isn't that like spending your lunch money on lottery tickets? Sure, you may go home loaded, but more likely you just end up hungry.
I agree Geno's ceiling is higher, but his floor is also MUCH lower (and I don't even mean that as a knock against the kid, but just the reality of a 3rd year player who's experienced nothing but struggles vs. a veteran who's already played/succeeded in the system).
If we need a QB to carry us to a SB, we likely don't have that on our roster, regardless. But if we just need one who doesn't screw things up, do you still think Geno is the better option? I'd love to think he is, but I don't see anything but "unrealized potential" as the reasoning behind it . . .
All fair points, OCCH, but I'm not talking about only 2015, I'm talking about finding a QB who can give you a chance to win championships for the next ten years. The best organizations don't go year to year with their QB's. Its not a case of, okay, this year we'll start Fitzpatrick, next year its Petty, the year after that the kid we draft in RD 1 in 2016 etc. etc.
The right way to do is it to find your QB, the guy who is going to be the guy you can build around, then you build the strongest team possible around him. Thats how the best teams in football do it. Now it might be a stretch to suggest Geno can be that guy, but its not a stretch to say he has the potential to be that guy, nor is it a stretch to say that Fitz can't be that guy, so I don't see the point in going right to Fitz before we definitively answer the Geno question.
I see what you did thereI understand/agree completely, except I'd say I don't see the point in going right to GENO before we definitively answer the Geno question . . .
This is not meant to be a knock on Geno but starting QBs do lose their job in preseason when there was no open competition. I am not sating it will happen but it could. Bowles will not play someone who does not deserve it no matter what is said in May.Not if they've already decided there won't be a competition . . .
No it won't gailey sets up the run with the pass don't matter who his qb is. He did it in buffalo and he did it with Pitt and kordell stewart. He also did it when he had freaking thigpen as his qb. The jets have better weapons than gailey has ever had.
I think you missed the "there's no qb competition" announcement. Check the OTA thread.
The more Geno plays the sooner the Bryce Petty era begins.
Please show us somewhere where anyone from the Jets has said this. And I will give you leeway, anyone from a ball boy to Woody, anyone, even just one person.
What is completely nuts is to ask for proof that very obviously is said when reading between the lines. Do you really think they will run and tell someone that they do not trust their QB's. The Times? Newsday? SI?
It's called "LOOK AT THEIR RESUMES". If you still don't understand afterward, re-read that and maybe someday it will sink in?
That is the most foolish thing I have ever heard. If you really believe that and Bowles does as well? Then, we can watch Chan Gailey PASS this team to an 0-16 record. Then, they'll all get fired.
Who knows with something that STUPID happening in the wake of Rex Ryan, maybe Woody will make every effort to rehire Rex Ryan?
Mainejet is right. Since Rex got fired, we haven't seen any media leaks.
I was hoping the QB competition would have taken place. Geno, Fitz, Petty, Simms, this other guy and whomever else. Put them all in the mix and let the best man win. This way whomever won, we as fans and the media could no longer debate that. I personal believe Geno would have straight won but that's just me. Geno has better talent snd upside then Fitz IMO head to head, Petty isn't ready for game action yet. Unless Petty is the next Russell Wilson and we don't know it yet, needs at least a year.That may all be true, laker, but it still begs the questions:
1. Can you get to and win the Super Bowl with Ryan Fitzpatrick?
IMO he's been in the league long enough that we know what he is and what he isn't. There's no upside. What you see is what you get, and I don't see a guy who can take us to the Super Bowl and win it, at least not unless we have a defense like the 85 Bears or 2000 Ravens and he's just along for the ride. So if you are trying to build towards a championship, as you should be (and as you well know as a Lakers fan), then I just don't see the point of starting Fitzpatrick even if you think he gives us a better chance to win 10 Games this year.
2. Has Geno maxed out as a player and is he too the finished product, so what you see is what you get?
If the answer to that question was YES, then I can definitely see going with Fitzpatrick, but I think even Geno's detractors would admit that there is still some untapped potential for a QB who came out of a spread offense in college, much like Petty, and is going into only his third year in the league. So while its entirely possible that he will continue to stink and never amount to anything in the NFL, there at least remains the possibility, however remote you wish to call it, that he can emerge as the long-term answer at QB, and with his physical talent, maybe even the kind of QB you can someday with a SB with. It might not happen, but at least the possibility exists.
Thats why I think this is the smart move, even if it fails.