Peter Schrager Full First Round Mock Draft

[Official Jets]

​

 

[Tinstar]

Full of hot air

 

[skop]

I like Schraeger... he said he based is report not on the bias of a reporter/analyst, but what he has actually learned in convo's with contacts of each organization.

don't know how accurate his sources are, but that is the foundation of his mock.

 

[Innocenti]

I wouldn't be upset with his #4 and #10 selections.

 

[Retired AFA]

We don't need a CB this high. Either an Edge or Offensive line at #4. Giants had a good draft.

 

[Innocenti]

We don't need a CB this high. Either an Edge or Offensive line at #4. Giants had a good draft.

OL is one of the areas where we'd be ok if no significant changes were made.

 

[Tinstar]

OL is one of the areas where we'd be ok if no significant changes were made.

Yes but aren’t we about tired with just being okay?

 

[Innocenti]

Yes but aren’t we about tired with just being okay?

We are. But out of EDGE, CB, DT, LB, S, TE, WR, RB and OL, OL is probably about 7th or 8th.

 

[Tinstar]

We are. But out of EDGE, CB, DT, LB, S, TE, WR, RB and OL, OL is probably about 7th or 8th.

From this draft, based on everything you think you know, who would you say is the biggest difference maker if you were to plug said prospect into our lineup?

 

[Innocenti]

From this draft, based on everything you think you know, who would you say is the biggest difference maker if you were to plug said prospect into our lineup?

If you think Sauce can shut down half the field, you take him at #4. But even without Mekhi, our o-line wasn't the worst unit.

 

[Old#15]

If JD doesn't trade back, #4 will be interesting in that an impact Edge or OL will be available. Either way if we walk away with Walker or Ikem I'll be thrilled. Lots of great possibilities, can't wait.

 

[Seaver41]

as if his 'contacts' are going to hand a guy on tv who does these mock drafts the secrets to the team draft strategy.....more fluff.

 

[skop]

@Seaver41 ... ordinarily, i am walking in lockstep with you on that... that's why "Rappaport" and "Schefter" drive me nuts with with always being on the phone when they are on air while "breaking a story" we are literally reading on the ticker at the very moment they're breaking it.

However, there is just something so innocently dorky about Schrager that i actually think he does have some flies on walls in NFL buildings.

 

[Seaver41]

@Seaver41 ... ordinarily, i am walking in lockstep with you on that... that's why "Rappaport" and "Schefter" drive me nuts with with always being on the phone when they are on air while "breaking a story" we are literally reading on the ticker at the very moment they're breaking it.

However, there is just something so innocently dorky about Schrager that i actually think he does have some flies on walls in NFL buildings.

I hear you, but my take is these guys are simply used by those insiders to pump out smokescreens/misdirection. Now of course when you pick and what you need does limit the amount of bs you can produce usefully. So in the end he's taking his nuggets of what they will confirm/deny and what they won't confirm/deny and then making guesses. The self promotion is in labeling it 'inside info'....'contacts within the organization'.........................in the end he has no idea what Joe has planned because he doesn't leak

 

[skop]

in the end he has no idea what Joe has planned because he doesn't leak

no truer words ever spoken.

 

[Innocenti]

in the end he has no idea what Joe has planned because he doesn't leak

He wears adult diapers?

 

[BlindsideD'Brick]

Kiper, McShay, Shrager and others do weekly mocks that change constantly. One minute it’s KT and London, then it’s Ekwonu and Sauce, then it’s Jermaine Johnson and Garrit Wilson.

When the draft is over someone will say “look at my second mock when I got it right”.

Well, sure you did.