Schefter reports trade done: Aaron Rodgers is a Jet

[SackExchange]

Jets get Rodgers, #15 2023, #170 2023

Packers get #13 2023, #42 2023, #207 2023, and a conditional 2nd in 2024 that becomes a first if Rodgers plays 65% of the snaps.

 

[jets82]

Way to much for a 39 year old premadonna that we don’t know if he’ll play more than one year but whatever. At least we’ll have him for one year and hopefully it will be a year that’s worth it!!!

 

[Bigmoe]

Excellent!!!!!!!!! Well done !!!!!

OMG !!!!!!!!!

 

[Bigmoe]

Way to much

Nope
Not in the least
Well worth it

 

[jets82]

Nope
Not in the least
Well worth it

We’ll see! Only time will tell.

 

[SackExchange]

It is pretty much exactly where we figured it could end up. I would imagine that there were some assurances from Rodgers about doing a couple years.

 

[jets82]

It is pretty much exactly where we figured it could end up. I would imagine that there were some assurances from Rodgers about doing a couple years.

Hope your right!

 

[LRJets]

Why I was never a GM.
I hope I'm wrong. Firstly, I do hope we have a top tier tackle at #15. Secondly, 65% ain't much which translates to possibly. two #1s . (This will make the "Lamar Crowd" go nuts. )
Marcus Spears was lauding the Packers GM, then he gave some props to J.D.
Last year we had it seems like 54 picks (11). Draft will be boring with less picks. Rodgers seems anxious to join the team. Garrett Wilson must be in heaven.
Anyway, Let's Go Jets!

 

[Retired AFA]

Wow, we gave up next years #1. Might have been better off trading up for one of the rookie QB's.

 

[Gramoah]

WHAT ? But how can that be ? No way that's true. Everyone knew the 49ers or Tennessee was going to get him. Not a chance he's a Jet.

 

[hatnlvr]

Not a fan of the conditional 2024 pick. I would have rather seen it based on our positional placing (IE if we make the conference championship), then on the percentage of snaps he takes.

So if he plays 65% and we finish 7-10 they still get our first! Not saying that's what's going to happen, but anything is possible. We need tip top A-Rod plus some blessings from lady luck on the injury front to make this all work.

 

[TebowCan'tThrow]

Think it's too much, but I'm glad it's done. If we win a SB then it's worth it.

 

[SackExchange]

Wow, we gave up next years #1. Might have been better off trading up for one of the rookie QB's.

Only if Rodgers plays 2/3rds of the snaps.

 

[TebowCan'tThrow]

Today is my dad's birthday and he was a Packers fan. The last game he watched in September before he passed away was the Packers. Maybe it was meant be for me.

 

[LRJets]

Only if Rodgers plays 2/3rds of the snaps.

If he doesn't we still gave up a #1 for a team with Rodgers that will be home on Super Sunday if he sits for that percentage.
Yes two #ones is much.

 

[Bigmoe]

Think it's too much, but I'm glad it's done. If we win a SB then it's worth it.

I don’t see how it’s too much
Basically a 2nd and 6th
I see that as nothing compared to how we fuck up picks anyway

Next year’s conditional ???
That’s it ??????
Who cares ????!!!!!!!

The Jets are a super bowl contender

And if not a very good to excellent team

When’s the last time anyHey fan said that ??????
Let’s see
How about never ???

LetsGo!!!!!!!!
#12
#8

Who gives a rats ass

I can’t see any Jet fan complain about this

 

[Bigmoe]

Today is my dad's birthday and he was a Packers fan. The last game he watched in September before he passed away was the Packers. Maybe it was meant be for me.

There you go

 

[Bigmoe]

Yes two #ones is much.

I don’t get it
We get #1 back
The other is a condition
At that point so what !!!!

 

[SackExchange]

If he doesn't we still gave up a #1 for a team with Rodgers that will be home on Super Sunday if he sits for that percentage.
Yes two #ones is much.

The one #1 is a pick swap. It's #13 for #15. That roughly equates to a third rounder in value, I believe.

 

[Bigmoe]

Think it's too much,

That’s exactly what the media will say and I’m hearing it from Fiants Danny Dines fans

I don’t get it ????