I don't believe anyone thinks Siemian is going to be a world beater and the answer for us. But that being said, throughout his career he has shown that he is a serviceable starter, and an average NFL QB. Right now with Zach we have "the worst starting QB in the league". Moving from worst to mid-pack is an improvement any which way you look at it
Trouble is, nobody in the NFL thinks Siemian is mid-pack any more. He is the #3, behind Boyle. We signed him because he doesn't give us 'a better chance to win' than Zach, and therefore doesn't create a controversy. Just think of the heat there would be from the fans and media if we'd signed Wentz or Kaepernick!
Fair enough, but I think most feel like the CS is forcing this little pet project named Zach down everyone's throats for better or worse. We saw first hand last season what the offense looked like swapping in another QB. I'm pretty sure this is the reason most are clamoring to get Zach back on the bench and lets see what someone else can give us.
I wouldn't argue that the CS are all-in on Zach. It was Zach's play last season that IMO fuelled the Aaron Rodgers gamble that now has the franchise 'Waiting for Godot'. It is part of the Rodgers gamble that we retooled our receiver room with old guys who can't get separation. Now if we got someone better than Zach and he did a good job it would create a problem when (if) the Messiah returned in December. I have problems believing that Rodgers won't get injured again.
Apart from when he played for us last time
360 degrees ?
i had a better record taking my dates on opening drives
