Oh boy.
He went on to say that they would view him as a bridge QB to Hackenberg.
I say "NO" to Cutler.
He went on to say that they would view him as a bridge QB to Hackenberg.
I say "NO" to Cutler.
Oh boy.
He went on to say that they would view him as a bridge QB to Hackenberg.
I say "NO" to Cutler.
Why are we recreating the Chicago Bears from a few years ago. They sucked. We won't be much better.
Why are we recreating the Chicago Bears from a few years ago. They sucked. We won't be much better.
Cutlers salary is only guaranteed for 2 million this year. He would probably wwind up cheaper than Fitz. My guess is 10 million. He can make the throws deep to anderson. It wouldn't be terrible while petty and hack get ready. The young wrs need a qb who can make the throws and not get them killed. Draft fournette and you take the pressure off cutler. Wouldn't be terrible.I have a friend who is a Bear fan. He's been hoping for the last 2 seasons the Bears would unload Cutler to the Jets. If he does come to the Jets, I sure hope it is done in a way that the Jets do not pick up his salary.
correct me if I'm wrong, you passionately campaigned for geno smith for months here..Great point. Cutler, Marshall, and Forte. That didn't amount to much then.
And Marshall has taken shots at Cutler as recently as a year ago. I don't see how they could coexist.
I still prefer Glennon or even Tyrod Taylor to Cutler. Cutler is said to be very polarizing, too. We don't need that nonsense right now.
Cutlers salary is only guaranteed for 2 million this year. He would probably wwind up cheaper than Fitz. My guess is 10 million. He can make the throws deep to anderson. It wouldn't be terrible while petty and hack get ready. The young wrs need a qb who can make the throws and not get them killed. Draft fournette and you take the pressure off cutler. Wouldn't be terrible.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
if we are going to go with the "save bowles job" route, i would prefer romo..Agreed, at the right price. The Jets need a veteran QB rental for at least a year. Cutler is probably about as good a choice as anyone. But again, at the right price.
if we are going to go with the "save bowles job" route, i would prefer romo..
with all due respect, i believe you're getting ahead of yourself..I'd be OK with him too. But his playoff performances have me worried.
correct me if I'm wrong, you passionately campaigned for geno smith for months here..
did we need that "nonsense" then??
at least cutler has had some success in the NFL..
"anything he did well"
And whose being delusional ?
See, that's the point I'm making.
Fans who who refuse to acknowledge good games Geno had. That's delusional. Or just a conscious effort to deny reality just to make a point.
honestly, that's fair..See, that's the point I'm making.
Fans who who refuse to acknowledge good games Geno had. That's delusional. Or just a conscious effort to deny reality just to make a point.