Isn't it so nice getting to know the posters from the other board? They get to know our...interesting...scout members, and we find out who theirs are.
It's like two dysfunctional families uniting at a wedding.
Isn't it so nice getting to know the posters from the other board? They get to know our...interesting...scout members, and we find out who theirs are.
It's like two dysfunctional families uniting at a wedding.
I haven't taken a look, so I don't know what this grand plan is, but does it involve actually replacing Wilfork? After all, they just let him go and created a big hole on the DL. As is, they weren't great at stopping the run last year, and will be worse without Wilfork.
So it would cost money to replace him.
How would you handicap the revis sweepstakes
my shot
jets even 1/1
pats 3/2
field 20/1
jets even 1/1
What odds would you give PAts and the field ??
Unless they feel like they already have someone in house, but regardless it's not going to be an 8 mil cap hit.
If they go with what they have in-house, their run defense is going to be even worse than last year's.
That pain in the ass Chris Jones is pretty good not as big as Wilfork (who is?) but he makes plays
If they go with what they have in-house, their run defense is going to be even worse than last year's.
I'm sure that would be your wish, but I'll bet you were also in the group that thought they couldn't find a replacement for Welker yet Edlman jumps in and is even better. The bottom line is they usually find a way, and it's never a zero sum game, if one unit takes a step back and another unit takes a step forward, where's the balance lie? Sorry if I don't jump off a bridge panicking but I've seen it all I terms of, "how are you going to replace "Fill in the blank player!!!!", and yet one way or another the Pats end up being one of the last teams playing in January/February every year. Look it may sound cocky and you may hate it as a rival fan, I know I would, but the fact remains, save for Brady there isn't a player on the team that can't be replaced.
It's arrogance. Boston fans used to be a lot like Cubs fans, lovable losers (except, of course, to Yankees fans). Then they started winning, and they became entitled.
Now they seem to assume that it will last forever. They have no recollection of life before the past 14 or so years, that the Sox went 86 years without a title, that the Pats were irrelevant until Mo Lewis hit Drew Bledsoe. Now they just assume that their empire will never crumble, that they will always be at the top, and that any move they make is great.
It's arrogance. Boston fans used to be a lot like Cubs fans, lovable losers (except, of course, to Yankees fans). Then they started winning, and they became entitled.
Now they seem to assume that it will last forever. They have no recollection of life before the past 14 or so years, that the Sox went 86 years without a title, that the Pats were irrelevant until Mo Lewis hit Drew Bledsoe. Now they just assume that their empire will never crumble, that they will always be at the top, and that any move they make is great.
It's arrogance. Boston fans used to be a lot like Cubs fans, lovable losers (except, of course, to Yankees fans). Then they started winning, and they became entitled.
Now they seem to assume that it will last forever. They have no recollection of life before the past 14 or so years, that the Sox went 86 years without a title, that the Pats were irrelevant until Mo Lewis hit Drew Bledsoe. Now they just assume that their empire will never crumble, that they will always be at the top, and that any move they make is great.
I think I've had enough of this troll. Time to ignore you for good.
Good-bye, funny guy.