82, correct me if I'm wrong because I don't want to mischaracterize your words, but if I'm reading you correctly, your position is that Brady shouldn't have been punished for cheating in the first place, its up to the other teams to cheat better than the Patriots, and if they don't, they have only themselves to blame if the Pats have a competitive advantage?
I'm not criticizing you if thats your opinion, but if thats gonna be the standard, that its basically a free for all, anything goes, whoever cheats the best, to the victor goes the spoils, then teams need to know that in advance, everyone needs to know that its anything goes, so you don't have some team, like the Patriots, cheating with impunity, and others trying to obey rules they don't need to obey, which puts them at a disadvantage.
I'm okay with anything goes, just so long as it applies across the board and everyone knows its anything goes.