The Case for Nick Foles

USANYJ

Rookie
Jet Fanatics
Aside from mariota being there at 6. Is there a scenario where we think chip would trade foles away regardless? Because as a few have said, I'm tired of grooming a qb...foles is 26 at the moment and has already had a dominant season. I'd love to have him here...but can we get him here if chip doesn't find his qb and Sanchez being a ufa?
 

Elias

The Invisible Man
Big Fish
Jet Fanatics
Jets Global
Aside from mariota being there at 6. Is there a scenario where we think chip would trade foles away regardless? Because as a few have said, I'm tired of grooming a qb...foles is 26 at the moment and has already had a dominant season. I'd love to have him here...but can we get him here if chip doesn't find his qb and Sanchez being a ufa?

I personally think this is wishful thinking. Our best bet like [MENTION=285]Superman55[/MENTION] suggested would to be to sign Bradford. Even if Kelly trades up for Mariota, he won't start him right away. He'll use Foles to hold the fort until Mariota is ready.
 
E

eaglenj

Guest
I personally think this is wishful thinking. Our best bet like [MENTION=285]Superman55[/MENTION] suggested would to be to sign Bradford. Even if Kelly trades up for Mariota, he won't start him right away. He'll use Foles to hold the fort until Mariota is ready.

Mariota would be a day 1 starter in that offense. It would be a very easy transition for him playbook/concept wise, he would just need to get acclimated to the speed of the NFL.

Foles is a valuable trade chip that could actually allow Philly to move up without paying an RGIII type ransom - in my opinion he has to be part of any deal.

One thing to note - Foles is going into the last year of his rookie deal (as a 3rd round pick its only a 4 year deal - there is not 5th year option like with a first rounder). That means that a team needs to have 2016 cap room to deal for him so that if he does have a good season, they can fit him under the cap at $9-11 million per season (or more).
 
G

GratefulJet

Guest
With respect to Bradford, let's be clear: he's under contract in 2015 to St Louis. So we can't sign him unless he is released, which is not a likely outcome, although it could happen. What we can do is attempt to trade for him, since his cap number is hefty. St Louis faces a dead money cap hit of $3,595,000 if they trade or release him, but they save $12,985,000 (2015 base salary) of his total cap number. It's a lot of money for a guy that has a high tendency to sustain knee injuries. I don't know if our offensive line can offer him the kind of protection he needs to do his thing, since he is a statue in the pocket. He can probably be had for a late pick (5th or lower), but we will have to pick up the tab for that ~$13 million salary. No one seems to know what the Rams are going to do at QB in 2015. Shaun Hill has a very low ceiling, and Austin Davis started out great but fell apart as the season progressed. They may decide to trade him and put the savings to work in other areas, or they may decide to give it one more shot and see what's left in his tank. A persuasive GM can probably pry him loose, but then we would be facing the same problem they are--how to protect him when he has no ability to evade the rush. Maybe the Rams haven't seen all the tape on Geno and would be interested in a swap? :smiley-cool11:
 

Elias

The Invisible Man
Big Fish
Jet Fanatics
Jets Global
With respect to Bradford, let's be clear: he's under contract in 2015 to St Louis. So we can't sign him unless he is released, which is not a likely outcome, although it could happen. What we can do is attempt to trade for him, since his cap number is hefty. St Louis faces a dead money cap hit of $3,595,000 if they trade or release him, but they save $12,985,000 (2015 base salary) of his total cap number. It's a lot of money for a guy that has a high tendency to sustain knee injuries. I don't know if our offensive line can offer him the kind of protection he needs to do his thing, since he is a statue in the pocket. He can probably be had for a late pick (5th or lower), but we will have to pick up the tab for that ~$13 million salary. No one seems to know what the Rams are going to do at QB in 2015. Shaun Hill has a very low ceiling, and Austin Davis started out great but fell apart as the season progressed. They may decide to trade him and put the savings to work in other areas, or they may decide to give it one more shot and see what's left in his tank. A persuasive GM can probably pry him loose, but then we would be facing the same problem they are--how to protect him when he has no ability to evade the rush. Maybe the Rams haven't seen all the tape on Geno and would be interested in a swap? :smiley-cool11:

Thanks for the clarification. I was under the impression that he'd be available in the open market.
 
U

ucrenegade

Guest
With respect to Bradford, let's be clear: he's under contract in 2015 to St Louis. So we can't sign him unless he is released, which is not a likely outcome, although it could happen. What we can do is attempt to trade for him, since his cap number is hefty. St Louis faces a dead money cap hit of $3,595,000 if they trade or release him, but they save $12,985,000 (2015 base salary) of his total cap number. It's a lot of money for a guy that has a high tendency to sustain knee injuries. I don't know if our offensive line can offer him the kind of protection he needs to do his thing, since he is a statue in the pocket. He can probably be had for a late pick (5th or lower), but we will have to pick up the tab for that ~$13 million salary. No one seems to know what the Rams are going to do at QB in 2015. Shaun Hill has a very low ceiling, and Austin Davis started out great but fell apart as the season progressed. They may decide to trade him and put the savings to work in other areas, or they may decide to give it one more shot and see what's left in his tank. A persuasive GM can probably pry him loose, but then we would be facing the same problem they are--how to protect him when he has no ability to evade the rush. Maybe the Rams haven't seen all the tape on Geno and would be interested in a swap? :smiley-cool11:

I already went into this a little bit with the way chan gailey runs his offense the QB doesn't take many sacks. All QB's under gailey as a oc averaged 22-28 sacks per season which is not bad.
 

Superman55

Franchise Tagged
Jet Fanatics
With respect to Bradford, let's be clear: he's under contract in 2015 to St Louis. So we can't sign him unless he is released, which is not a likely outcome, although it could happen. What we can do is attempt to trade for him, since his cap number is hefty. St Louis faces a dead money cap hit of $3,595,000 if they trade or release him, but they save $12,985,000 (2015 base salary) of his total cap number. It's a lot of money for a guy that has a high tendency to sustain knee injuries. I don't know if our offensive line can offer him the kind of protection he needs to do his thing, since he is a statue in the pocket. He can probably be had for a late pick (5th or lower), but we will have to pick up the tab for that ~$13 million salary. No one seems to know what the Rams are going to do at QB in 2015. Shaun Hill has a very low ceiling, and Austin Davis started out great but fell apart as the season progressed. They may decide to trade him and put the savings to work in other areas, or they may decide to give it one more shot and see what's left in his tank. A persuasive GM can probably pry him loose, but then we would be facing the same problem they are--how to protect him when he has no ability to evade the rush. Maybe the Rams haven't seen all the tape on Geno and would be interested in a swap? :smiley-cool11:

You are right about the injury issues...but I see Bradford and Foles in the same situation...both in the last year of their contract with teams that dont want to give them extensions, so its either trade him and get something or keep him and he likely walks next year...for both

I think Foles and Bradford are both statues that need a solid oline, both likely cost a 2nd rd pick plus something, and both will need to be resigned if deemed the answer after their 1 season tryouts.

Neither is a free agent and neither is likely to just be plain released with such a high demand on QBs...Bradford has a higher cap # than Foles by far, but both have 1 year left and will be playing for bigger contracts in 2016.
 

Superman55

Franchise Tagged
Jet Fanatics
Nick Foles - QB - Eagles
The Philly Inquirer believes Nick Foles could be the "odd man out" after the Eagles' re-signing of Mark Sanchez.
Beat writer Jeff McLane says Foles could "net a high draft pick" in trade talks, and continues to believe the Eagles will target a trade up for Oregon QB Marcus Mariota in the draft. In an extremely quarterback-needy NFL, Foles could probably fetch a second-round pick. Sanchez's two-year, $9 million contract is at the high end of backup quarterback money, and a sensible sum if the Eagles are going to view him as a "bridge" to a rookie.
 
J

Jet Setter

Guest
With all the talk about Mariota falling and Chip really wanting him, while at the same time not being “sold” on Foles as his QB, I thought it was pertinent for us to really look at Foles and some comparable players.

Foles has been questioned after “regressing” in his second year as a starter after having an obscene 27 td and 2 int season. Obvioulsy that td-int% over a regular season is a statistical outlier, but to be fair, he also completed 69% with 2 tds and no picks in their playoff loss. He ‘regressed” to 13 tds and 10 picks over 8 games this past year (completing 59%). One side note, the eagles lost Bill Lazor, admittedly an excellent QB coach, and replaced him with Bill Musgrave, which was a huge downgrade. Now, 59%-13-10 isnt great, but below are 3 very good NFL QBs who also regressed early on in their career:

After sitting his first year, and having a solid second year (17tds and 16ints) Drew Brees followed that up in his 3rd year with 11td and 15 picks.

After sitting for 2 years, in his first starting season Phillip Rivers went 22 tds and 9 picks but followed that up with a 21 td 15 int season before he started putting it together the following season.

Lastly, Ben Rothlisberger was considered an immediate success, however it certainly wasn’t because of his individual stats, but rather his team was successful, winning a SB in his second season with him having a solid playoffs, but a 123 yard 0td 2 int SB. His next season the team missed the playoffs and he threw for 18tds with 23 ints – in his 3rd full year starting.

That is a pretty solid list of guys who “regressed” early in their careers. Most importantly you have to look at characteristics these guys all have in common, that Foles happens to also share. NFL Arm strength, size (except for brees) and hand size (brees has large hands for his height), are all extremely important qualities for a good NFL QB. Andy Dalton seems fine when you look at his record, but if you cant throw outside the hash marks or make a defense think you can throw deep, then it is simply too difficult to beat a good defense in the playoffs, which is why he has struggled so much, and thats with a top 5 WR at his disposal. Foles can throw deep and outside the hash marks, is tall, and has huge hands, all of which are important starting points for success in the league especially when added to the fact that over 22 games he has shown an ability to protect the football, while also playing some games in cold weather.

On the flip side, I can see the argument about not wanting someone that Chip Kelly doesn’t want – but 2 things there. First off, Roseman is a horrendous GM, and if he doesn’t like Foles, that’s a positive in my mind. Secondly, I believe chip wants someone with a threat to run in his offense and foles cannot run at all. That's why its more an issue of foles not being a fit rather than indicative of foles ability to play in general, just his ability to play in that offense. I understand that its not necessarily a positive that his team wants to trade him, but I don’t know what the knocks against him as a player truly are? Did he benefit from Chips offensive mind and first year in the NFL with that offense – absolutely. But did he have great WRs or a great TE – absolutely NOT? He had an exceptional RB, but everything he accomplished was with riley cooper and Jason avant at WR (borderline terrible players) and showed an ability to actually win while also not turning the ball over.

The fan in me wants a player like mariota – hes exciting, has HUGE upside, and could turn out to be a true dual Threat QB who can run but also operate in the pocket, he would excite the fan base and seems like an awesome kid to root for. I also think he would be an excellent fit with chan gailey, but we would need to tailor the offense to him, otherwise we are just the 180 degree opposite of chip/foles with a pro-style OC and mariota not being a fit. However, the analytical side of wanting to win regardless of the flash mariota has, sees the opportunity to acquire a player who has NFL measurables, has proven they can win and protect the football over a 20+ game NFL sample size, and also allow us to potentially acquire enough additional draft picks to still build a team around him. Foles isn’t aaron rogers, nor do I think that is even a possible outcome, but I think he is certainly as good as joe flacco, and with the possibility that he could be as good as rothlisberger or rivers, I make that deal.

Roseman has operated the biggest revolving door in sports. He's manic. Can't keep stability afloat there. We'll take Foles off his hands.
 
M

Mainejet

Guest
The only reason why I or any Jets fan would want Nick Foles is because of the plethora of picks that will likely come with him. Otherwise, every Jets fan wants Marcus Mariota. That's a fact.

This also isn't to say that Foles does not have some very good points. He's a great system QB. But lets be honest, if it weren't for the unbelievable amount the eagles would surely be trading to get to number 6, Nick Foles would not even be on the radar.
 

Superman55

Franchise Tagged
Jet Fanatics
Nick Foles - QB - Eagles
A source tells NJ.com the Rams, Titans and Texans showed interest in trading for Nick Foles during the Senior Bowl in January.
The Eagles reportedly "made an effort to gauge the value of Foles with other teams in the league" in January. The notion that they're looking to trade him has only gained steam since then, especially after Mark Sanchez was given "bridge" quarterback kind of money Monday. If Chip Kelly can't get his man in Marcus Mariota, it's possible he settles for UCLA's Brett Hundley or Baylor's Bryce Petty in the draft. Foles' status remains completely up in the air.
 

jets82

Curious George
Jet Fanatics
Report: Texans and Eagles talking Andre Johnson for Foles
If this is the case and it happens, I'm thinking the Jets should go with Mariota then at #6 . Unless Phila blows them away with their first, second and third this year and next year. Then maybe I say yes but if Foles goes to the Texans, Phila losses a lot of leverage with us. IMO
 

jets82

Curious George
Jet Fanatics
The only reason why I or any Jets fan would want Nick Foles is because of the plethora of picks that will likely come with him. Otherwise, every Jets fan wants Marcus Mariota. That's a fact.

This also isn't to say that Foles does not have some very good points. He's a great system QB. But lets be honest, if it weren't for the unbelievable amount the eagles would surely be trading to get to number 6, Nick Foles would not even be on the radar.
I agree with this. The draft picks makes the difference here but like I said in the above post, if Phila trades Foles to the Texans then the Jets should draft Mariota. Unless Phila blows the Jets away with a offer like their first, second and third this and next year. So it works both ways IMO. Foles is essential in this trade or the Jets might as well draft Mariota.
 
F

flgreen

Guest
With all the talk about Mariota falling and Chip really wanting him, while at the same time not being “sold” on Foles as his QB, I thought it was pertinent for us to really look at Foles and some comparable players.

Foles has been questioned after “regressing” in his second year as a starter after having an obscene 27 td and 2 int season. Obvioulsy that td-int% over a regular season is a statistical outlier, but to be fair, he also completed 69% with 2 tds and no picks in their playoff loss. He ‘regressed” to 13 tds and 10 picks over 8 games this past year (completing 59%). One side note, the eagles lost Bill Lazor, admittedly an excellent QB coach, and replaced him with Bill Musgrave, which was a huge downgrade. Now, 59%-13-10 isnt great, but below are 3 very good NFL QBs who also regressed early on in their career:

After sitting his first year, and having a solid second year (17tds and 16ints) Drew Brees followed that up in his 3rd year with 11td and 15 picks.

After sitting for 2 years, in his first starting season Phillip Rivers went 22 tds and 9 picks but followed that up with a 21 td 15 int season before he started putting it together the following season.

Lastly, Ben Rothlisberger was considered an immediate success, however it certainly wasn’t because of his individual stats, but rather his team was successful, winning a SB in his second season with him having a solid playoffs, but a 123 yard 0td 2 int SB. His next season the team missed the playoffs and he threw for 18tds with 23 ints – in his 3rd full year starting.

That is a pretty solid list of guys who “regressed” early in their careers. Most importantly you have to look at characteristics these guys all have in common, that Foles happens to also share. NFL Arm strength, size (except for brees) and hand size (brees has large hands for his height), are all extremely important qualities for a good NFL QB. Andy Dalton seems fine when you look at his record, but if you cant throw outside the hash marks or make a defense think you can throw deep, then it is simply too difficult to beat a good defense in the playoffs, which is why he has struggled so much, and thats with a top 5 WR at his disposal. Foles can throw deep and outside the hash marks, is tall, and has huge hands, all of which are important starting points for success in the league especially when added to the fact that over 22 games he has shown an ability to protect the football, while also playing some games in cold weather.

On the flip side, I can see the argument about not wanting someone that Chip Kelly doesn’t want – but 2 things there. First off, Roseman is a horrendous GM, and if he doesn’t like Foles, that’s a positive in my mind. Secondly, I believe chip wants someone with a threat to run in his offense and foles cannot run at all. That's why its more an issue of foles not being a fit rather than indicative of foles ability to play in general, just his ability to play in that offense. I understand that its not necessarily a positive that his team wants to trade him, but I don’t know what the knocks against him as a player truly are? Did he benefit from Chips offensive mind and first year in the NFL with that offense – absolutely. But did he have great WRs or a great TE – absolutely NOT? He had an exceptional RB, but everything he accomplished was with riley cooper and Jason avant at WR (borderline terrible players) and showed an ability to actually win while also not turning the ball over.

The fan in me wants a player like mariota – hes exciting, has HUGE upside, and could turn out to be a true dual Threat QB who can run but also operate in the pocket, he would excite the fan base and seems like an awesome kid to root for. I also think he would be an excellent fit with chan gailey, but we would need to tailor the offense to him, otherwise we are just the 180 degree opposite of chip/foles with a pro-style OC and mariota not being a fit. However, the analytical side of wanting to win regardless of the flash mariota has, sees the opportunity to acquire a player who has NFL measurables, has proven they can win and protect the football over a 20+ game NFL sample size, and also allow us to potentially acquire enough additional draft picks to still build a team around him. Foles isn’t aaron rogers, nor do I think that is even a possible outcome, but I think he is certainly as good as joe flacco, and with the possibility that he could be as good as rothlisberger or rivers, I make that deal.

I don't necessarily agree with your conclusions, but great post.

My fear with the trade is that I have seen the Jets pass on, or have teams change their mind on a trade at the last minute (Farve) and the QB turn into a near HOF'er.

Both Winston and Mariota have a super high ceiling, of course they could both go bust, as Foles could. If I'm Macc, and Mariota, or Winston (unlikely) is there at 6, I really have a hard time pulling the trigger on a trade. If I'm Kelly I'm very worried Macc feels the same way
 

maxmet

Pro Bowl 1st Team
Jet Fanatics
If Eagles dont have Foles to include in the deal, what would the "book" value be for a move from 20 to 6

I assume we get their 2nd round pick and their first next season - but what more do we get?
 
E

eaglenj

Guest
I don't necessarily agree with your conclusions, but great post.

My fear with the trade is that I have seen the Jets pass on, or have teams change their mind on a trade at the last minute (Farve) and the QB turn into a near HOF'er.

Both Winston and Mariota have a super high ceiling, of course they could both go bust, as Foles could. If I'm Macc, and Mariota, or Winston (unlikely) is there at 6, I really have a hard time pulling the trigger on a trade. If I'm Kelly I'm very worried Macc feels the same way

The problem is that to date, teams receiving a boatload of picks from another team trading up usually make out very well. However, can you put a price on a possible star like mariota.

While we as fans all care about the Jets winning more then anything, the truth is that Mac cares about the Jets winning secondary to his own job security - something we as fans dont need to worry about.

Mac can take all the picks, see how foles does, and if he has a good season here, signs him and Mac looks great. If foles fails, Mac can ride use the "St Louis factor" - that he has a good team, but has never been able to draft "his guy" (just like the rams and les snead have been doing) and buy himself 2-3 more years as we wait for a franchise Qb.

On the other hand, if foles is just average, but mariota becomes a star, while at the same time being the role model/winner type guy that he is so far, that would be almost impossible to recover from as a GM. You dont get re-hired if you were the one that traded away the pick that was the next russel wilson.

Statistically speaking its probably better to take a ton of picks and hope that foles develops as i outlined in the original post - he definitely has traits you can build on. But as a fan myself, it would be fun as hell to draft mariota and hope he becomes our russel wilson for the next 12 years.
 

Superman55

Franchise Tagged
Jet Fanatics
Nick Foles - QB - Rams
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the Rams and contract-year QB Nick Foles have had "initial talks" about a long-term deal.
Per RapSheet, the "target" date for an extension is ahead of Week 1. We're not sure why the Rams would want to do a long-term deal with Foles before he's even played a down for the team and is coming off a shoulder injury, but maybe they see a buy-low window here. That's if they believe Foles' 2013 season wasn't an aberration. (It was.) He's going to be a game manager-type for the Rams.
 
Top