To be clear My point is simply this: I felt trading back into the 1st was unnecessary.
I feel Boston and a guy like CJ Allen or any of the CBs and S available when they picked would have been more valuable than Cooper and Ponds. I think if they would have stayed put at 33 and 44 they would have gotten equal value or more imo.
Like I said its all personal preference and opinion.
What is puzzling us is why you think the third and fourth picks are related. They are completely separate.
The Jets wanted WR Cooper, who many thought they would take at #16, and they gave up a FIFTH round pick in order to move up a few spots and leapfrog the Bills. Sure Boston may have been there at #33 but they wanted Cooper.
THEN
In the second round the Lions apparently wanted a DE at #44 so the Jets traded down six spots and gained a FOURTH round pick. Moggie's assessment was that the state of the draft board meant that we wouldn't lose much value in the second round pick, and sure enough we took Ponds, who Tankathon projected as the #40 pick.
THEN
We used the fourth round pick to trade up for Klubnik, who was the best QB available at that point.
Moggie's trading up and down the draft suggests he was actively getting the guys we evaluated as useful rather than just picking somebody because it was our turn.