Slept on it and I still don't like this pick. For one thing I hate drafting ILB's in the first round. Too me its like drafting a RB or an OG in the first round, unless he's a HOF caliber player (like Zeke Elliott who I thought was the best player in the draft and said so some weeks back), IMO its a dumb move.
The game is not about ILB's anymore, they are mere pawns on the Chess Board, now its about the franchise QB, the guys who protect the franchise QB's off the edges, the guys who attack the franchise QB's off the edges, the receivers the franchise QB throws too, and the Corners who cover those receivers.
Once upon a time the MLB's and ILB's controlled the game, now they are merely incidental, they do not impact the game in any significant way. IMO the first round is for drafting impact players.
That said, not only did we draft an ILB (Bowles own words) at #20 last night, we drafted an undersized 4-3 WILL OLB we plan on converting to 3-4 ILB, so on top of drafting an ILB, we drafted a project who is undersized for the base defense we run. In so many ways this pick made no earthly sense, thats why you will not find one reputable mock draft that projected Darron Lee to anything but base 4-3 teams like Atlanta at 17, which was a popular landing spot for Lee. There were others, but they were ALL 4-3 teams.
To be clear, I have no problem with the talent, I myself mocked him in the TOP 20, so I recognize the value, but the value IMO was for a 4-3 team that needed an OLB, not for a 3-4 team where he becomes an undersized ILB project. IMO that nullifies the value he carried as a 4-3 OLB prospect.
When grading front seven prospects, SCHEME MATTERS!!!!
When grading them for base 3-4 teams, SIZE MATTERS!!!!
Lastly, when drafting in the first round, POSITIONAL VALUE matters too.
IMO we whiffed on ALL THREE with this pick.
Granted we added terrific speed, but the player is miscast, too small and moving to a negligible position.