I'd rather stick with Geno Smith.
I'd trade all 3 for Hackenberg. I'd trade all 3, mo, and our 1 for Hackenberg.
Long way to go before June and a little to early to predict what QB's will be at the top...this is not as bad as you suggesting the Jets make an RG3 type trade to get Geno when he got off to that hot start his senior year.
Long way to go before June and a little to early to predict what QB's will be at the top...this is not as bad as you suggesting the Jets make an RG3 type trade to get Geno when he got off to that hot start his senior year.
Im not sure I consider Ryan Fitzpatrick, Geno, and Petty, along with Mo, and a 1, equal to 3 first rd picks, and 2 second rd picks...along with 3 mid to late rd picks.
if you could trade Geno, Fitz, and Petty, along with Mo and a 1 for 3 first rd picks, 2 2nd rd picks, and 3 additional picks...you wouldn't?
I think your analogy is off base. It is equal to what the Giants gave up for Eli though...that may be a better comparison...
I wasn't making an analogy...i was poking fun.
Just making sure you dont really think Geno, Petty, Fitzpatrick, and Mo could be traded for what RG3 was traded for...
Some jets fans, especially those on this board, may really think we could get 3 first rd picks and 2 2nd rd picks for those players...along with 3 late rd picks...
I mean, some think Fitzpatrick can get us 14 wins...despite being cut by the titans, rams, bills, and texans...so nothing surprises me any more.
Some Mods compared Fitz to Brady yesterday...so you never know.
I'd trade all 3 for Hackenberg. I'd trade all 3, mo, and our 1 for Hackenberg.
i am interested, though, in quotes to support some of these ridiculous accusations. Who said the jets could be 14-2 with fitzpatrick?
I'd hold off to see if Hackenberg can put up better stats than he did last year before trading the entire franchise for him.
12 TDs, 15 INTs, a completion percentage below 56%, and he's the best QB since Luck? Let's see him get a season completion percentage above 60% in college before bestowing such greatness upon him.
But I'm sure you would be this high on him if he chose to attend a different Big 10 school.
There's looking at stats and watching the game. PSU had no oline last year...most of our top 10 recruiting class this year are olineman.
But if you actually watch hackenberg play...well, you'd know why every mock has him top 10 despite his stat sheet...pretty sure this poster didnt fill out every 2016 mock draft on the internet. Im amazing, but that's stretching it, sir.
hyatt
I'm not disputing he has the potential to be Top 10. I am questioning how someone with that stat line can be considered the best QB since Luck, regardless of what is around him.
And I did watch him, though not through blue-colored glasses.
well thank goodness "those on this board" have not interfered with you posting..Just making sure you dont really think Geno, Petty, Fitzpatrick, and Mo could be traded for what RG3 was traded for...
Some jets fans, especially those on this board, may really think we could get 3 first rd picks and 2 2nd rd picks for those players...along with 3 late rd picks...
I mean, some think Fitzpatrick can get us 14 wins...despite being cut by the titans, rams, bills, and texans...so nothing surprises me any more.
Some Mods compared Fitz to Brady yesterday...so you never know.
Pfffttt.hyatt
HYATT™;40647 said:Pfffttt.
I believe HYATT™ expressed (11-5)/(12-4), not (14-2).
Could be wrong and will stand corrected - if you can PROVE it.
You remembered it partially right.I remember it a Fitzpatrick thread, but couldn't find which one. I remember it being in a long write up that included our D being inline with the 85 bears and 00 Ravens. Maybe you said 12-4. I could be wrong. But I remembered it was a better than a wet dream scenario for the jets. I remember thinking it was a jets dream come true post with Fitzpatrick taking us to the bring of the Super Bowl lead by our D. I hope that prediction comes true.