lol...i think i may join you in the mob if they take another d-lineman in the 1st
i'm never a fan of using a 1st on RB, at least these days. the positional value just isn't there at that point of the draft, especially given how many mid-to-late round and even undrafted RBs prove to be very good nfl backs.
i'm always a believe in BPA, but all other things being equal, i'd want o-line first and then OLB
Agree 100% with this. I was listening to Gil Brandt the other day talking about the Cowboys decision to take the Manster - Randy White over I believe Walter Payton, and it was very interesting to hear their rationale. Back then RBs were routinely taken early and often in the first round, But Dallas decided the #1 pick shouldn't be used on a position that had a shelf life of on average 5 years. Their decision to take White landed them a premium player who was a Cowboy for 13 years. Payton was no doubt a great one, but they were happy with their decision. Also don't feel that a RB is worthy of our first round pick.
OL/OLB would make me very happy in the first two rounds. Speedy guys in 3rd - 7th, with perhaps another QB in the mix.