"NFL Draft 2015 - Everything Draft Related (Trades, Picks, Team/Pick Breakdown, etc)"
Gotta Pick one, Sarge
If it happens I'll bump the thread and we'll see who nailed it, thats why we can only take one.
In all fairness, if Bradford wasn't an egg back there, he might have had a real shot to be a great QB. I think Newton still has a legit chance. It's not a lot, but that's what I got.
Not to speak for RI, but I'd agree if he's saying winning the Heisman can lead to an overvaluation of a player, which in turn leads to less than expected results more often than not.
However, I do not agree that the trophy has some "Brady Bunch totem curse" that dooms all winners to future bustdom . . .
However, I do not agree that the trophy has some "Brady Bunch totem curse" that dooms all winners to future bustdom . . .
3 positions Jets won't spend a draft pick on (after #6)
3 positions Jets won't spend a draft pick on (after #6)
All positions are the table at #6 , but the Jets WILL NOT draft a player at the following 3 positions after pick number 6
1 - Wide Receiver - We could take Cooper or White, but we have very good depth at WR with 4 or 5 very solid potential contributors (Evans, Owusu, Enunuwa, etc) and I doubt we take a WR if we pass on one at #6
2 - Offensive Line - Scherff is a possibility at 6, maybe Peat, but we have 5 + potentially good backup linemen already on the roster - Aboushi, Winters, Freeman, Dozier, Johnson, etc. A backup OL is not a need
3 - Cornerback - I doubt we take a CB at 6 or any other round
We WILL draft these positions in rounds 2-7 depending what we do at 6
S, ILB, OLB, RB
possible drafts positions are
QB, TE
3 positions Jets won't spend a draft pick on (after #6)
All positions are the table at #6 , but the Jets WILL NOT draft a player at the following 3 positions after pick number 6
1 - Wide Receiver - We could take Cooper or White, but we have very good depth at WR with 4 or 5 very solid potential contributors (Evans, Owusu, Enunuwa, etc) and I doubt we take a WR if we pass on one at #6
2 - Offensive Line - Scherff is a possibility at 6, maybe Peat, but we have 5 + potentially good backup linemen already on the roster - Aboushi, Winters, Freeman, Dozier, Johnson, etc. A backup OL is not a need
3 - Cornerback - I doubt we take a CB at 6 or any other round
We WILL draft these positions in rounds 2-7 depending what we do at 6
S, ILB, OLB, RB
possible drafts positions are
QB, TE
ILL say La'iel Collins no SCHERFF.....no COLLINS...
L COLLINS OT LSU
(Way out of box pick ELI HAROLD....he will not be there at 37
L COLLINS OT LSU
(Way out of box pick ELI HAROLD....he will not be there at 37
Don't totally agree Sarge with everything..if they don't pick a WR at 6..I still think WR is on board down line..especially one that can return kicks/punts....but if they do take WR at 6, then I think you are right on saying..they wont address it again.....
Also think they do take some sort of CB somewhere down the line....but like you said...I doubt it will be at 6
also I think somewhere they take a young OL..Breno..might be gone next year...Winters/Oboushi are mediocre..Colon is old.....and Brick might have too a prohibitive salary after this year...
a lot of this depends on if they make any trades to get other picks.....
I don't agree with any of Sarge picks.
3 positions we won't draft after 6
Center
Kicker
Punter
If I had to pick more - TE, FB, and S
I believe the Jets will take a CB in this draft.
3 positions we won't draft after 6
Center
Kicker
Punter
If I had to pick more - TE, FB, and S
I believe the Jets will take a CB in this draft.
Gregory OLB
Roger Vick.....or DeVante Parker
I think at 6..CB is a very UNREALISTIC probability..if they trade down..perhaps.....
Sounds a lot like the apologists for Carson Palmer who all seem to say he was on his way to being great, until he wasn't.
I can agree with one thing about that. He wasn't, and isn't, great.
Please carefully review what I have said on this topic. Never have I mentioned a curse, or any other hocus pocus, when it comes to Heisman QB failures. My arguments are based purely on history, not mysticism.
I really hate the "silly" argument, which is itself, well, silly. We have some 50 years of history to go on that Heisman QB's will bust in the NFL. Let's try to confine the discussion to why the past 50 years of history or so can't be used to predict the likelihood that the next Heisman QB won't be a bust, OK? Instead of just saying the historical argument is silly. Personally, I think ignoring 50 years of history is silly. Now, can we drop the "silly" argument and just stick to the facts?
The problem I have is if Mariota was so good then there is no way Tennessee trades away the opportunity to pick him. We traded up for a QB and that worked out horribly and hurt our depth. Same thing would happen here. If he falls to us then maybe we take him, but not one draft pick should be traded to get Mariota.