I really hate the "silly" argument, which is itself, well, silly. We have some 50 years of history to go on that Heisman QB's will bust in the NFL. Let's try to confine the discussion to why the past 50 years of history or so can't be used to predict the likelihood that the next Heisman QB won't be a bust, OK? Instead of just saying the historical argument is silly. Personally, I think ignoring 50 years of history is silly. Now, can we drop the "silly" argument and just stick to the facts?
My honest opinion is it is silly, sorry. Like I said time we tell we have 2 winners in the mix this year.