Pats are Pats and will always be our thorn in the butt but what about the Bills? Should we be worried? They have looked good in preseason. Defense looks much better than they did last year. Maybe more comfortable.
Pats are Pats and will always be our thorn in the butt but what about the Bills? Should we be worried? They have looked good in preseason. Defense looks much better than they did last year. Maybe more comfortable.
Those two Buffalo Games, also taking into consideration that its the coach we had just fired to hire Bowles, was BY FAR Bowles biggest disappointment in his first year as HC.
IMO those two games dropped his first year grade from what would have been an A+ had he simply split those games and made the playoffs, to a B for winning ten games, a big improvement over the previous year, but no higher than a B because we spit the bit in those Buffalo Games, particularly the last one with everything on the line. If Bowles has a competitive bone in his body, and I know he does, he has to be chomping at the bit to get another crack at the Bills.
Incidentally I can say all of the same for Fitz in his first year. Just replace Bowles name with his and all of the above remains exactly the same. So if he has a competitive bone in his body, he has to be chomping at the bit for Buffalo too.
I was listening to NFL radio yesterday. Some "expert" was expounding on the intricacies of the league and when it came to the AFC he said:
Patriots are a lock even if they lost Brady.
The reasoning:
1. The Dolphins are bad
2. The Bills are led by Ryan
3. Ryan Fitzpatrick is the Jets QB
That's it, then he went on to another division
I changed the station
I was listening to NFL radio yesterday. Some "expert" was expounding on the intricacies of the league and when it came to the AFC he said:
Patriots are a lock even if they lost Brady.
The reasoning:
1. The Dolphins are bad
2. The Bills are led by Ryan
3. Ryan Fitzpatrick is the Jets QB
That's it, then he went on to another division
I changed the station