I know it gets old reiterating the same deficiencies but they are real and not going away.........WR corp is a mess with no one able to get open mid/downfield. Berrios is good close to line, but that can be taken away. running game and protection suffers from inadequate OL unit and TEs are brutal in protection and cannot stretch field.
Can't agree more with the sentiment about drafting a WR early.........but if Joe is in the market to deal one of the two 1st rd picks, either a playmaker or OL or DB won't be taken high. LOTS of mystery still to unfold with this draft and draft order. In a lot of ways it's more fascinating than last year's draft
this FA & Draft will be twice as fascinating as last year's...it almost has to be.
oh heaven's, i am going to take a beating for this,
but last year's draft was a disaster, in as much as it can be heralded.
we still cannot impose our will on either side of our lines. we routinely get pummeled on the Oline and the Dline.
which makes this year's draft an extension of last year's draft, because we are fixing the same areas.
i would love a high pick to go for a WR and a bigtime TE, and/or a 3 down bell cow RB...but how do you justify that when JD is drafting for the 3rd time and hasn't completed an Oline rebuild, and has DT's who underwhelmed in a 3-4, and now a 4-3.
i would rather rent 2 WR's and threat at TE in FA; and spend big money on them, for a
very short heavily loaded bonus contracts , in favor of completing the OLine and DLine, ball hawking safety's, and coast to coast LB's.
but that would mean trading down multiple times and possibly out of the first round all together; not a prospect most will favor.
but if you do that, then you can draft the rented player's replacements in subsequent drafts.