not sure i buy that argument.
he was suspended 4 games for substance abuse policy violations. that had nothing to do with his driving at over 140, endangering a kid, and being found in a car reeking of pot and containing a loaded semi-automatic handgun.
yes, he was very lucky it was only 1 game for this. but he did not serve 4 games for basically the same situation. if anything, the prior situation called for a more harsh response, not leniency for "time served"
The league had the opportunity to suspend him last year, when the two offenses coincided. They held out until the courts had their say.
The courts did, and exonerated him for the kid, the pot, and the gun. His plea agreement was for resisting arrest. Since the league withheld their additional punishment until the courts ruled, they could only go by the ruling.
So saying he should have gotten more because of the kid, the alleged smell of pot, and the legal gun, goes against what the league said it would do.