I asked you nicely to leave me out of your pathetic diatribes. You paid no attention.
I'll let the mods handle you
Feel free. Hopefully they teach you where the ignore button is you always threaten to use.
I asked you nicely to leave me out of your pathetic diatribes. You paid no attention.
I'll let the mods handle you
My analogy was exaggerated, but it was made to prove a point. Just as it is wrong to dogmatically adhere to a strict BPA strategy, it is similarly wrong to ignore BPA to solely address needs, when the guy who is by far clearly the best player does not play a position of need.
Hobson made a good point earlier, maybe Williams grades out at 97 and White at 93...im sure Suh and Thomas likely had similar grades that year...some people compare Williams to Reggie White. Wow, that will be fun to watch. Again, I just dont know when you stop adding to Reggie White, Richard Dent, Chris Doleman, and Charles Haley all on the same team...eventually, I feel you need to draft another position.
I'm sure they won't be, ridiculous to think any regime would draft nothing but one position because they were the BPA when their draft picks came up. I made a slight joke myself about it but we all know that won't happen. I'm assuming the 2nd and 3rd will be LB, WR or OL. Also a chance for QB. With the last five picks, I'm guessing will cover WR, LB, OL, RB and probably QB (in whatever order). If Mo is in play for a trade and it happens, that will be more picks also.come on. do you think this is realistic? i'm sure they make adjustments based on what else we've drafted and aren't 1000% slaves to the board.
I understand the argument. And I think you do have to consider need, but not if there is a big gap between one guy and the rest of your board. If the best player available is not a position of need, but he really is hands-down the best player available, an absolute stud for that draft slot, you take him.
Like I said, our scouting department is awesome at picking dlinemen...I expect to add an awesome one annually.
I just wish they could do that with QBs...a position that would actually get us out of the top 20 picks...
Uh...doesn't pretty much the entire scouting department have one draft pick under their belts? Maccagnan got rid of the old guard.
So why would you make a blanket statement like that, when it's not even the same guys any more?
Rich Cimini retweeted
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter · 4h4 hours ago
Bills GM Doug Whaley on Jets' 1st-round pick Leonard Williams: "We thought the best defensive and probably the best player in the draft."
Rich Cimini @RichCimini · 2m2 minutes ago
Leonard Williams doesn't have car or driver's license. Says he didn't need one on USC campus. Needs one now. #nyj
Rich Cimini retweeted
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter · 4h4 hours ago
Bills GM Doug Whaley on Jets' 1st-round pick Leonard Williams: "We thought the best defensive and probably the best player in the draft."
Rich Cimini @RichCimini · 2m2 minutes ago
Leonard Williams doesn't have car or driver's license. Says he didn't need one on USC campus. Needs one now. #nyj
Are you sure? I thought he only changed a handful, not the entire department. I do remember 4-5 new people, but not an entire clean slate.
The top two. Director of player personnel Brian Heimerdinger, and the senior director of college scouting Rex Hogan. Area scouts are currently being evaluated with decisions on them post draft.
we were yesterday
They showed us yesterday that if we had a 25 year old John Elway and Jim kelly was BPA in the draft, we would select Jim Kelley...and the next year we'd draft Favre, then the next year Brady, and Marino, and just keep drafting BPA...that's what we did yesterday...the Matt Millen approach...just draft Wrs every year...we just draft dline every year and keep getting high picks...funny how that worked for him is how it has worked for us...
So the guys who run the scouting department got changed, but we're going to hold them responsible for the decisions of past regimes.