Oh, so we're doing year by year evaluations of his contract to justify the side of a debate? Very tricky, 51. How about year 3, not year 2, when he makes $5 mill per and gronk and graham are now making 100% more than Clay... for 2 years of the deal, he's a top paid TE, for 3 years of his deal, he's paid like an average TE...so 2 year's he's paid like a great TE, 3 years he's paid like an average TE, we all agree he's a good TE (i.e. somewhere in the middle)...so his contract seems appropriate...
One day I'll introduce you to my friend D Revis.
He has some interesting thoughts about the value of contracts once the "big money" expires . . .